Compare and Contrast of the Od

Sophocles Oedipus the baron and Homers Odyssey deuce deal on the topic of loyalty. In both whole kit and caboodle the character Tiresias, a blind prophet, participates in the divers(prenominal) pilgrimages by damping various(a) equitys to the main characters. man the main importance of Tiresias in The Odyssey is to enter that righteousness git joint be subservient, his importance in Oedipus the power is to flak to discourage Oedipus on his journey to find the trueness be arouse he k in a flashs the ordinary play whoremaster be negative as well.         The premiere thing that should be examined is the antithetic ways that Tiresias reveals the integrity in the two works. In The Odyssey, Tiresias is direct and to the point. He starts by stating that A sweet smooth journey office is what you translatek, only if a god depart make it hard for you. From what fuel be read, Tiresias feels no need sugarcoat what he is notification for two simple fountains. First, he came willingly to Odysseus, sugarcoating the the true would be a waste of time. The second and more(prenominal) fundamental reason is that he has close watchword for Odysseus, relative to what has happened so far. On the some(a) other hand, in Oedipus the King, Tiresias skirts around give tongue to Oedipus the justness. In position, he initially ref utilise to tell Oedipus anything at all, seen in such lines as Youll retrieve nothing from me and Ill never reveal my terrific secrets. The important thing is that when Oedipus got Tiresias angered, Tiresias brusquely stated that [Oedipus is] the curse, the corruption of the land. When Oedipus responds to this, which will be discussed later, he continues to claver Tiresias for lying. Following that, Sophocles uses Tiresias to omen the rest of the play for the reader, while cryptically half-hiding and half- notice Oedipus the truth, which is essentially ignored. The fact that Tiresias had to be summ mav end, instead of advent on his own, and that! Tiresias attempted to brood the truth from Oedipus, shows that Tiresias was trying to value Oedipus. He knew it would cause Oedipus ill-treat in the end. Tiresias differing attitudes in the works serves as a couple to how the truth told in widely distri onlyed. Truth that brings hope to people is ordinarily easily given, unless truth that brings sadness or despair is prevalently told with perplexity and reluctance.         The response to the information given by Tiresias is also important due to its difference. In Homers work, Odysseus reaction to the news is different than the joy that one energy normally expect. kind of of a reaction of happiness or joy, Odysseus simply asks how he canister communicate with his dead mother. tho this in itself reveals something important. Essentially, Odysseus is instantly awargon that he has more than a good chance of reversive home soon, but liquid cannot be overjoyed because of tautness that he has suffered s o far. wiz could say that he is simply not near as worried as he was before, essentially he now has hope to arrive home to his wife and son because of Tiresias revelation. Oedipus reaction, on the other hand, is much different from that of Odysseus. Simply put, the reaction to the truth that Tiresias reveals is utter disbelief and anger. Oedipus can not comprehend that he could be the plague, so he accuses Tiresias aligned with Creon in a part of a spell to overthrow him. The irony beingness that it is Oedipus the one searching for the truth, but when it is told, he is to close-minded to see it. Eventually Oedipus finds step to the fore the truth for himself and must originalize that Tiresias was telling the truth, especially about being bettor of not discriminating the truth of his heritage and actions. The significance of this affinity is that it also reveals the general reaction of ships company to truth. While Odysseus reaction was not of the win up and do a prosperou s dance type, one can still see that he benefited fro! m the truth, and in that respectfore had to be at least somewhat glad of what Tiresias told him. In the subject area of Oedipus, the truth proved to be denigrative and therefore denied at first until it was confirmed by second source. In the accepted world, it is essentially the same. If finding out the truth succors someone, they would generally be appreciative of cheating the truth at the very least. On the other hand, if the truth is harmful, the general reaction is to deny it until there can be no doubt. To put it very simply, good news is separate than mischievous news.         Although already somewhat covered, the make of Tiresias informing the two main characters and the story as a whole should also be examined in a more specific manner.

The effect of Tiresias telling Odysseus the truth and guiding is The Odyssey is piano to see. Because of what Odysseus learnt from Tiresias, Odysseus was given hope and managed to matter home to Ithaca. In other words, because of what Tiresias told him, he managed to complete his journey home. The result of what Tiresias told Oedipus in Oedipus the King is a bit more convoluted than with The Odyssey. While what Tiresias told Oedipus was true, Sophocles used that scene more as a way to auspicate what would happen later on in the play quite an than a direct maculation motivator. This can be seen in the fact that Oedipus essentially discounts Tiresias prophecy, convincing himself that Tiresias is trying to mess with him. further what Tiresias told Oedipus did collapse an effect, although different than what would have been expected, especially since Tiresias was a bank and r! espected seer. That effect was the saving about of suspicion in Oedipus mind of whether or not he really was the soulfulness who murdered Laius. As a result of this suspicion, Oedipus began to pursue the truth with more fervor, which did eventually leave behind to his confirming the truth that Tiresias had already hinted at. In relation to the real world, this is significant because it shows that while truth is a wonderful and helpful idea, it is better to not know the truth because of the pain it can cause.         Both these works, when taken in comparison to each other, reveal much about how society tends to deal with the subject of truth. On the one location, represented by The Odyssey, is the idea that truth is beneficial, and can help one on their own personal journeys by dint of life. Sophocles Oedipus the King represents the other side of truth, the bad and potentially harmful side. This play shows that there are truths that people are better off not know ing, for it would cause them more harm than good. As can be seen, both these works views on truth do play hard into how society as a whole generally views and reacts to different kinds of truth, being the good truths that help and the bad truths that hinder. If you want to get a full essay, straddle it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper