Critical Approaches Paper: The Wife of Bath Essay

Geoffrey Chaucer (1343-1400) was an English author, poet, philosopher, courtier as well as a diplomat. Sometimes referred to as the father of English literature, the man is most(prenominal) famous for The Canterbury storeys. Chaucers major(ip) works also include the translation of Roman de la travel The Book of the Duchess The Ho custom of Fame Anelida and Arcite The Parlia man proponentt of Fowls the translation of Boethius Consolation of Philosophy as Boece Troilus and Criseyde The Legend of Good Women and the Treatise on the Astrolabe (Geoffrey Chaucer, 2007).Being a well-rounded intellectual, Chaucer was assured of the gender stereotypes permeating his mediaeval society. As a matter of fact, men of the Middle Ages deeming marriage a full great sacrament took most seriously the chars look for to honor and obey. The slightest breach of this imprecation of obedience was hailed as a crying offense to both immortal and man. The principal vice of the gallant times was pride. Disobedience was but an offset printing of this self same vice. And so, obedience was due not scarcely unto paragon and unrivaleds parents, but, as the old phrase went, to economizes and other benefactors and s all everywhereeigns. Women were cognise to be subjected to men, and in that respect was not as much thought poured over womens equal right to manage affairs. Thus, we find in medieval literature instances such as the ones briefly touched on by Frederick Tupper (1968) in Types of Society in Medieval Literature An old Parisian benedict of the fourteenth century, mashing mentor to his young bride offsets Petrarchs report of the obedient Griselda with the example of a wife rightly burned for the disobedience into which she was led by her pride quite as captious APPROACHES idea THE WIFE OF can varlet 2 grievous an offense this, so he tells us many times, as the fault of Eve or of Lucifer. It was during this period that Chaucer chose to represent his woman in litera ture the married woman of john as an extraordinary peeress who believed in subjecting her men to her desires. The lady is undefendable to express her views ab verboten a different role that women can play despite the essential gender stereotypes of medieval society.The wife of tubful has manoeuvre of her husbands property, presumably acquired through successive marriage settlements. She therefore has no take away to submit efforts to please her mates, if such efforts would stimulate given her greater place over her men in terms of wealth or pleasure. harmonise to her Prologue, her push throughgrowth three husbands had rubber luck in bed, for which they are chided by her. The woman would demand payment in bed, in re overturn for which she would make payment ( innerly) of the marriage debt she owed them (Nelson, 2002).Knowing that all medieval women do not behave like her when it comes to controlling their husbands property or getting funds out of them, the married wo man of bath is asking young girls to back out of marriage altogether. Why please a man when it is more small-fruited over all to please and serve God? is her final transmission line on the question of marriage. The wife of Bath says that three of her husbands were good, and two were bad. The first three were rich, old, and submissive, although she tormented them with accusations that were constitutional lies she confesses to the rest of the pilgrims.She accused her husband of having an affair, for example, and then launched into a tirade in which she charged him with a bewildering array of accusations. If one of her husbands got drunk, the Wife of Bath claimed that every wife was out to destroy her husband in particular. She also made her husband feel guilty this way, and so CRITICAL APPROACHES PAPER THE WIFE OF BATH Page 3 he gave her what she requireed. The Wife of Bath selects that she deliberately caused her husbands grief.She teased them in bed by refusing to give th em full satisfaction until they had forecastd her money. She says that she made them work at night, in fact, to pay her marriage dette. What is more, the woman admits proudly that she used her verbal and sexual power to bring her husbands to total submission. In point of fact, the Wife of Bath uses the same tactic, i. e. , verbal power to bring the young sawbuck to total submission in her Tale. She confesses in her Prologue that she failed to follow the marriage rule of biheste is dette. scarce when the young knight in her Tale is sentenced to death by moving in leader Arthurs court for raping a defenseless young woman, his only probability to escape the penalty of execution is to find the answer to the question, What do women want most? The young mans search for the answer is delusive until he meets an old woman who promises to give him the answer if he would promise her, in return, to grant the request she makes of him. The rapist promises to keep his word, and after he h as supplied Arthurs queen with the answer that can save his life, the old woman asks him to marry her.In this case, as in the personal story of the Wife of Bath, the woman is subjecting the man unto herself by asking him to make a promise for something in return (Nelson). The Wife of Bath is knowledgeable enough to admit that more than a few Fathers of the Church, including the Apostle Paul, had proclaimed the importance of virginity. But if virginity was so critical, there would be someone still to produce virgins Thus, she would leave virginity to the perfect, and quit herself instead to use her gifts as best as she could. Besides her use of intellect in marital affairs, undoubtedly the gift that she refers to is sexual power.She uses this power not only to enjoy her life to the full, but as an pawn to manipulate her men as well. CRITICAL APPROACHES PAPER THE WIFE OF BATH Page 4 Patricia Clare Ingham (2002) calls the Wife of Bath one of the most capable readers in the history of literature, and sees the aggressive re-reading of scripture on the part of the Wife of Bath as a means of displaying and resisting the medieval anti-feminist customs or misogyny.The Wife of Bath frequently misquotes the scriptures. Scholars believe that these misreadings of texts were a mark of governmental and cultural acuity on the part of the Wife of Bath, as these bad readings give us a clearer picture of the culture of the time and the medieval gender relations (Schibanoff, 1986). The Wife of Baths re-readings of scripture have additionally been referred to as a utopian group fantasy, whereby the women would direct themselves against the anti-feminist tradition of the time, which was actually a social institution that was neither necessary nor the only face of truth of the Middle Ages.This idea of group or sorority was, in fact, explored by Brian W. Gastle, who wrote that although it is difficult to prove that women had gathered forces to beat the odds, there whitethorn h ave been a sorority of this kind that functioned outside the boundaries set by the set up guilds to which working women also belonged. The Wife of Bath, as we know, is into the cloth making business (Ingham). The lady blasts clerkly writers for their biased perspectives, and in so doing, activates the literary tradition for an altogether new set of social uses, such as understanding the importance of women.Her assessment of the politics of writing is interlinked with her representation of the politics of reading. She desires the production of an only if different kind of literature, the kind that the feminist classroom would read. Her Tale is include in this category, of course, and it is revolutionary. Still, critics worry that the Wife of Bath may be fishily affirming masculine desire through her Tale. As Lynne Dickson (1993) puts it, the Tale may genuinely reward the CRITICAL APPROACHES PAPER THE WIFE OF BATH Page 5concession of masculine maistrie with the very thing patriar chy wants to begin with. The Tale is, after all, about a rapist knight who can turn magically into a dutiful husband and about an aged lady who becomes a sweet young thing yet again aside from an old middle-class woman, comen of so lough a kynde, who gains status and rule from her blue blood husband. Most scholars have interpreted the Wife of Baths have-to doe with in sovereignty of wife over husband as an face of her dissatisfaction over the rule of her dry land.Sovereignty extends beyond the confines of the bourgeois class in this case, given that the Irish were concerned about sovereignty over a nation at the same time as Chaucer and his coevals were writing about sovereignty over a husband (Eisner, 1957). Indeed, there do appear to be political questions posed in the Wife of Baths Tale, especially when the recalcitrant knight objects to his marriage to the old lady, saying, Alas, that any of my nacion/ sholde evere so foule disparaged be The old lady wonders aloud if the knights rejection comes through his subjection to the laws of the court Is this the lawe of Arthures hous? she asks Is every knight of his so dangerous? Only a lady of charisma, of great political cortical potential coupled with leadership qualities, could have addressed intricacies of the political life of the nation at the time of the Wife of Bath when gender stereotypes were comprehensively controlled by the authorities, including the Church.The woman seems to know how to tackle legal terminology to boot (Ingham). She genuinely is remarkable for the Middle Ages, and deserves a continual round of applause from everyone today. CRITICAL APPROACHES PAPER THE WIFE OF BATH Page 6 References 1. Dickson, Lynne. (1993). Deflection in the Mirror Feminine Discourse in the Wife of Baths Prologue and Tale. SAC, 15, 1993, p. 61-90. 2. Eisner, Sigmund.(1957). A Tale of Wonder A Source Study of the Wife of Baths Tale New York Burt Franklin. 3. Geoffrey Chaucer. (2007). Wikipedia. Retrieved from http//en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Geoffrey_Chaucer. (24 February 2007). 4. Ingham, Patricia Clare. (2002). Pastoral Histories Utopia, Conquest, and the Wife of Baths Tale. Texas Studies in Literature and Language, Vol. 44, Issue 1. 5. Nelson, Marie. (2002). Biheste Is Dette Marriage Promises in Chaucers Canterbury Tales. Papers on Language & Literature, Vol. 38, Issue 2, 2002, p.167. 6. Schibanoff, Susan. (1986). Taking the Gold out of Egypt The Art of Reading as a Woman In sexual practice and Reading Essays on Readers, Texts and Contexts (Ed. Elizabeth Flynn and Patrocinio P. Schweickart). Baltimore Johns Hopkins University Press. CRITICAL APPROACHES PAPER THE WIFE OF BATH Page 7 7. Tupper, Frederick. (1968). Types of Society in Medieval Literature New York Biblo and Tannen.