Family Law - case study1 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Family Law - case study1 - Essay ExampleFurthermore the trade union virtues also show that if the marriage has been intimate (consummated) indoors a 6 month period during which a divorce is filed consequently the couple is required to wait 6 more months to a year before they can re-file for a divorce decree2. Furthermore the no-fault areas of the marriage, preceding a divorce slang to be examined as well. Because John does non want a divorce and wants to work on the marriage then the court would look at the impact a divorce might pitch on him in particular. However, as was stated, due to the policies skirt the divorce laws in the UK and England in particular, on that point will be a great deal of commission and other interventive measures utilized to try and save this marriage if indeed it were to proceed into the family courts. The primary reasoning for counsel is going to fall into the area of the courts expecting there to be take and coherent mental competency to da te that both of the individuals are aware of their actions and are fully understanding of what will take place within their lives after a divorce is granted3.As the laws in cohabitation have changed drastically in the past some years, there are new stipulations in regards to couples who live together and often the same laws that govern marriage apply to cohabitating partners4. However, cohabitant partners are not wholly equal to married couples in all respects, not tally to the English laws. For instance married couples do have the protection of marital law to assist them if there are problems that develop that have to do with property or a specific living military position where violence is occurring5. However, following modern civil law, a cohabitating couple such as Jeremy and Claude can put on a set of rules that ultimately divides the property between the two and of which is upheld in a court of law just as a married couples property rights would be viewed. Therefore there is the possibility that Jeremy could have a healthy way of forcing Claude to vacate the flatbed that they share but due to the circumstance that they dont have a legal civil partnership creates other types of problems besides not being married brings. For instance, without a civil partnership there are no real legal grounds that an individual within a cohabitating relationship can rely on fully. This isnt to say that Jeremy would not have any legal protection at all but the point that is being made is that it would be further mixed by the fact that the two arent married, there is violence in the relationship, and no civil partnership is in existence to refute any adverse statements or actions that might come into being6. The law is quite clear on one aspect of this domestic problem however, regardless of whether the couple is married or not. Because of the fact that the flat is solely in Jeremys name the law would stipulate that he could enforce the removal of Claude by dint of a legal means without any adverse repercussions to himself. However, any joint property that remained in the flat would have to be legally divided according to any legal arrangement that Jeremy and Claude have in affect. If they have none (which without a civil p