Mill vs. Raz Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Mill vs. Raz - Essay ExampleGuided by one very simple principle he outlines an argument for a system, which he believed, provided the best possible environment for respective(prenominal) and social progress (Mill, 1991, p.30). Mill advocates for humans shortcoming and their incompleteness of knowledge, which means that the truth is not always the truth. Based on Mills assertions, any one group who attempts to coerce another group or individual is breaching individual liberty, which leads to the stagnation of the intellectual community. The give away to progress lies in the condition of seeking the best span of human experience and development. The individual in the Millian broad-minded society is engaged in experiments in living attempts to find new, deeper or merely different sources of happiness in bearing, uncoerced by the state or fellow individuals. (Ryan, 1991, p.166) The most important facial gesture of public assistance is to note that the individual has complete author ity in matters regarding themselves, society does not train the right to restrict the individual, as long as the actions of the individual is not causing harm to themselves or others. Liberty is, therefore, an integral component of well-being liberty provides the best possible conditions to achieve the permanent interests of man as a progressive being. (Mill, 1991, p.31)In Josephs Razs The Morality of Freedom, his theory does not rest on a human beings fallacies but instead he argues that the individuals w... Raz creates an idea of the individuals well-being results from not just one being but that individuals situation within a culture, history, and society. He bump offs the simple argument that if a government can make a universal decision to prevent murder, then the state can act in defense of moral reason. Raz states that governments should promote the moral quality of the life of those whose lives and actions they can affect. (1988, p.415) He advocates that the individuals b equeath adapt to societys preferences and then will be able to have a good life, striving for well-being. Raz declares that the importance of a liberal society does not rely on the individual choice, as it does for Mill, but instead the individual should be able to choose between various alternatives that have been determined and supported by the society where the individual resides. A persons well-being should not be dependant on how the individual lives their life and how they determine their actions to be of vale but rather their well-being rests on how living a life is priceless independent of how it helps the individual. As he explains, an autonomous life is valuable only if it is spent in the pursuit of acceptable and valuable projects and relationships. (1988, p.417) To best illustrate Mill and Razs ideals for an individuals well-being take for example an persons addiction to alcohol. Through Mills theory, the essential and priority for an individuals liberty in this self-r egarding conduct and the belief in human experimentation does not accrue any benefits for the individual. It is highly unlikely that the majority of individuals will benefit from a life influenced by drugs. Raz on the other hand argues that the life of a drug addict is clearly inferior in damage